Competencies And Distinctive Capabilities -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Competencies And Distinctive Capabilities? Answer: Introducation Whether in an argument or a debate, the presentation of evidence accompanied with reasoning is important. Such is known as a rebuttal. A rebuttal should undermine a claim or weaken an opinion. However, in my critique assignment, a rebuttal is a discourse with norm to provide a unique critique. The word is, at times used in association with refutation. Refutation is all about providing statements that are contradictory in an management of any kind. However, the two terms are different in a strict argument. While rebuttal involves the provision of evidence, refutation will only rely on opinion that is contrary. Any comment that is agreed or disagreed with should be support using reasons or evidence. In arguments, lack of evidence would poorly reflect on ones point of view (Doyle, 2017). The articulation of counterargument is the most effective rebuttal any opinion with which a writer agrees or disagrees. Just like in everyday forums pertaining to philosophy, review of arguments and cri tiques is vital. Arguments are meant to persuade people in everyday life. In this case, the assignment provided is an irrationally convincing one and should have its characteristics changed. However, I have come to realize that an article with an argument referred to as a logical argument and truly good is supposed to be persuasive and rational (Hofstrand, 2017). This is not because it is intended to be appealing to irrational people or force rational thinking into people, but because it is convincing. Logics and evidence need to be communicated appropriately. The reason for argumentative communication in philosophy is to solicit criticism. Such critiques would help in determining if an argument is sound, fallacious, unsound, or irrationally convincing. In as much as arguments that are irrationally convincing may also persuade with practical uses, spotting problems and fallacies is easy. Such fallacies can be spotted in rational point of view (Saxena, 2014). To enhance my argument, there are four general elements that should have been incorporated. By referring to the argument as good, I mean that the assignment is made in a genuine attempt to be rationally convincing and logical and not the irrationally convincing kind of an argument (Kader, 2017). The four elements of rational argument are: Premises Any form of argument referred to as logical should have premises. Such premises should be clearly stated or identified. By definition, premises are statements that are declarative, also known as propositions. Such propositions are sources from which conclusions are made. They are also known as the assumptions (Price, 2011). Sources An argument that is good and convincing should have sources for premises. In any case any of the premises is false, the argument is considered irrational. Therefore, if the ready doubts any of the premises, the argument wont convince. Even if something is obviously true or common knowledge to the writer, the reader might not be clearly sure if it is. Besides, it is always assumed that things commonly believed to be true are often not true. Sources are at times exempted from premises considered to be self-evident. Good sources are not provided for reasons of self-evidence. However, if a source is found from a true definition or self-evidence, it can be used (Kaplan, 2017). Inference Inferences are fallacies or logics used for concluding arguments. Such references may either be fallacious or logically valid. As a matter of fact, an argument can still be considered logical even if the premises are false (SanDiego, 2017). Conclusions The deductions from premises are referred to as conclusions. They are determined from logical inferences. From a logical perspective, if the premises are true, the conclusions will also have to be true. In such a case, the argument is considered logically valid. Such a case means that if the argument is illogical, the conclusion may be false and so does the premises. On the contrary, the conclusion, through sheer coincidence, may be true even for illogical arguments. The truth is that it is a fallacy to have proposition concluded as false because it is part of an argument that is unsound (Ethics, 2017). My argument has left the reader in dire need of rebutting it. As a result, the truth in the argument must be attacked through its premises or validity of its logic. By attacking the credibility of the sources of the argument, the truth of the premises can be determined. On the other hand, the validity of the logic can be determined by pointing out the fallacys logical. Evidence, in an argument, should be the focal point (Pirtea, Nicolescu, and Botoc, 2009). Also, a proper rebuttal should rely on elements as a way of winning arguments. Last but not least, communication ethics is vital. In every argument, writers should be able to identify and resolve ethical concerns (Careerizma, 2017). In an attempt to do so, the basis of a strong argument would be needed. There are hidden curriculum lessons that may affect the ability of students to express themselves without causing ethical conflicts. Nursing that students are nurtured to go through such situations with a lot of ease, the curricula designers need to determine the circumstances in which students would have difficulty addressing ethical issues. Afterwards, students should be provided with proper skills of communication. There are several studies that show that students have challenges under this topic (Ethical Standards, 2017). Others argue that students perceive ethical conflicts in their everyday studies. On the contrary, studies havent determine if the comfort of students challenging what they think to be unethical behavior shifts with regards to specialty rotations or the reasons behind students difficulties in bringing up ethical issues. A proper guide to any developed curriculum should determine the areas that students find comfort or discomfort when it comes to raising ethical concerns. Through teamwork, aspects of group work that lead to such difficulty should also be determined. Through the specialty of students, I can hypothesize that level of comfort pertaining to challenging ethical issues is likely to vary (Capabilities and Competences, 2017). Reference Capabilities and Competences (2017) Capabilities and Competences. [online] Ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk. Available at: https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/research/dstools/capabilities-and-competences/ [Accessed 20 May 2017]. Careerizma (2017) Communications Skills. [online]. Management, Examples, Types, Importance and Training. Available at: https://www.careerizma.com/skills/communication-skills/ [Accessed 14 Dec. 2017]. Doyle, A. (2017) Communication Skills for Workplace Success. [online] Employers Look For These Communication Skills. Available at: https://www.thebalance.com/communication-skills-list-2063779 [Accessed 14 Dec. 2017]. Ethical Standards (2017) IMPLEMENTING EFFECTIVE ETHICS STANDARDS IN GOVERNMENT AND THE CIVIL SERVICE. [online] Available at: https://www.oecd.org/mena/governance/35521740.pdf. [Accessed 20 May 2017]. Ethics (2017) Importance of Ethics in Accounting Financial Decision Making, . [online] Available at: https://yourbusiness.azcentral.com/importance-ethics-accounting-financial-decision-making-4394.html [Accessed 20 May 2017]. Hofstrand, D. (2017) Improving Business Communication Skills. [online] Organizational Communication Structure. Available at: https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/wholefarm/html/c5-116.html [Accessed 14 Dec. 2017]. Kader, M. (2017) Strategic Management (StratMgt). Open2study.com. Available at https://www.open2study.com/courses/strategic-management [Accessed 20 May 2017]. Kaplan (2017) Critical success factors and core competencies. [online] Kfknowledgebank.kaplan.co.uk. Available at: https://kfknowledgebank.kaplan.co.uk/KFKB/Wiki%20Pages/Critical%20success%20factors%20and%20core%20competences.aspx [Accessed 20 May 2017]. McArthur, E. (2010) Diversity in the Workplace - Leading Association for Diversity Conferences and Collaboration. Workforcediversitynetwork.com. Available at https://www.workforcediversitynetwork.com/res_articles_managingdiversity_mcarthur.aspx [Accessed 20 May 2017]. McKay, M. (2017) Effective Business Communication Skills. [online] Communication Etiquette. Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/effective-business-communication-skills-2865.html [Accessed 14 Dec. 2017]. Mitel (2017) Improving Your Business Communication Skills. [online]. Available at: https://www.shoretel.com/improving-your-business-communication-skills [Accessed 14 Dec. 2017]. MSG (2017) Resources, Competencies and Distinctive Capabilities. [online] Managementstudyguide.com. Available at: https://www.managementstudyguide.com/resources-competencies-distinctive-capabilities.htm [Accessed 20 May 2017]. Pirtea, M., Nicolescu, C., Botoc, C. (2009) THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING IN MODERN ORGANIZATIONS. Annales Universitatis Apulensis, Series Oeconomica, 11(2). [Accessed 20 May 2017]. Price, S. (2011) Qantas unions stand up to management. [online] Greenleftweekly. Available at: https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/qantas-unions-stand-management [Accessed 23 January 2018]. SanDiego (2017) Business Communication Skills. [online] Extension. Available at: https://extension.ucsd.edu/courses-and-programs/business-communication-skills [Accessed 14 Dec. 2017]. Saxena, K. (2014) Capabilities versus Competence: How are they Different?. [online] Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20141123155439-7430899-capabilities-versus-competence-how-are-they-different [Accessed 20 May 2017].